Substantive AI mentions over time
Mentions classified as policy, instructional, or administrative context (passing references excluded), broken out by stance. Year is taken from school_year when available, else meeting_date; mentions without either are excluded from this chart but counted in the totals above.
Stance & context distribution
Among substantive (non-passing) mentions, what tone do districts strike, and where in their documents does AI come up?
Stance (substantive mentions only)
Context (all AI-related mentions)
Most-named AI tools
Tools called out by name in district documents. Generic terms ("AI", "generative AI", "LLM") are excluded; common variants are folded together (e.g. "ChatGPT" / "Chat GPT" / "OpenAI GPT").
| Tool | Mentions | Districts |
|---|
By state
Click a column header to sort. Substantive = districts with at least one non-passing AI mention. Stance percentages are over substantive mentions in that state.
| State | Districts | Mentioning AI | Substantive | % pro | % cautious | % restrictive |
|---|
Recent first-time AI mentions
Up to 100 districts where a new AI-related event was detected (a document where the district hadn't previously talked about AI), most recent year first. Click a row to open that district's profile.
| Year | State | District | Stance | Context | Enrollment |
|---|
Look up a district
Search to jump to a district's full profile (achievement, demographics, policy timeline).